Uranium Mining

A Qld Government media Statement follows..........

Minister for Natural Resources and Mines
The Honourable Andrew Cripps

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Queensland takes next step to uranium mining industry

The Newman Government has today taken the next important step in re-establishing the uranium mining industry in Queensland.

Natural Resources and Mines Minister Andrew Cripps today released an action plan to implement a best practice regulatory framework for uranium mining in Queensland that will ensure the maintenance of strict environmental, safety and approval standards.

“The government has developed this implementation strategy in response to a detailed report by the Uranium Mining Implementation Committee (UMIC) which was released in March 2013,” Mr Cripps said.

“The strategy outlines the actions various state government agencies will deliver and covers all aspects of the approvals process, including environmental standards, safety and health, economic and community development, indigenous opportunities and native title.”

Mr Cripps said uranium exports had the potential to generate significant revenue for Queensland over the next two decades.

“With an estimated value of the in-ground uranium resource in Queensland of approximately $10 billion, with more than $8 billion located in north-west Queensland, the industry has real potential to support economic growth and job creation,” he said.

“The government’s focus is to ensure all the uranium-specific regulatory guidelines and protocols are in place to begin assessing applications from mid-July 2014.

“Importantly, the Newman Government has endorsed the Committee’s key finding that, with certain adaptations, Queensland’s existing systems for regulating mining and radiation safety are robust and can accommodate uranium across the mining cycle.”

The best practice regulatory framework will take account of all relevant issues across the uranium mining life cycle such as:

-       Whole of project assessments (including tenure management)

-       Safe handling and transportation

-       Safety and health risk management systems

-       Environmental management, and

-       Native title

A Uranium Mining Oversight Committee will be established to review and monitor progress against the action plan and take a lead role on technical oversight issues, project governance and delivery timeframes.

Mr Cripps said commercial demand for uranium would determine when uranium mining would recommence in Queensland.

“There are a number of factors that will influence the timing of uranium mining operations and it is ultimately a commercial decision for industry proponents," he said. 

“These factors include the world market price for uranium, supply and demand in that market, and mining costs.

“The Queensland Government’s role is to provide investment certainty for industry by having best practice regulatory, compliance and approval processes in place.”

More information is available at:

http://mines.industry.qld.gov.au/mining/uranium.htm

[ENDS] 12 September 2013

Media contact: Jane Paterson 0417 281 754

EHP's Regulation Strategy

EHP’s Regulation Strategy

Back in February 2013, the Department of Environment and Heritage Protection announced fundamental changes to the way it manages and regulates the risks to Qld’s environment and heritage places.

I believe it is prudent to understand how the current regulatory strategy has changed from past practices of the former Department of Environment and Resource Management (DERM).

From the Budget Papers released in June 2013 it would appear that EHP now has less financial and human resources for regulation management than DERM did (apart from an injection of funds for Coal Seam Gas regulation).

Part of the rationale for the change in strategy includes:

·       speed up the time it takes for clients to get an approval,

·       increase the number of inspections of high-risk activities, and

·       make sure EHP are taking strong enforcement action where needed.

I have noticed a trend towards a lot less regulation and so-called “light handed regulation”, however what regulation remains is being enforced with vigour.

A selection of the department’s enforcement actions are summarised in prosecution bulletins outlining the facts and outcomes of finalised prosecutions.

The department’s annual compliance plan informs the Qld community of EHP’s planned compliance activities for the coming year.

The department monitors and reports on EHP’s compliance activities as part of its annual compliance plan program through a mid-year report and an end-of year report. The mid-year report  provides an update on the progress achieved in meeting the targets outlined in the annual compliance plan during the first and second quarters of the reporting period (July to December).

I have yet to see he end-of-year report which details all activities undertaken during the reporting period (July to June) and the outcomes of the compliance projects undertaken.

The reports provide information on the number of incidents and complaints the department has responded to as well as the enforcement actions taken during the reporting period.

EHP has also put together a short presentation about the changes to the way it manages and regulates environmental risks and how they will affect you as their client.

Since February 2013 there has been a new focus on the environmental outcomes a client must achieve.

For example, if one is required to ensure that no pollutants are released into the air, or that wastewater released to a river must meet certain quality standards, EHP will no longer assess whether a client can meet those outcomes, or how they propose to achieve them.  The responsibility now sits with you as EHP’s client.

This will now be the responsibility of the client and not the role of the department.

EHP still provide some guidance and examples on acceptable ways of managing environmental risks, but the decision on how those risks will be managed will sit with the client.

So when EHP grant a licence, the department will impose conditions that set out outcomes that the client must achieve.

EHP no longer impose conditions that tell the client how to achieve those outcomes.

For example, the department may impose a condition that contaminated stormwater must not leave a site, but it will not impose conditions that set out the design of the stormwater system needed to achieve this. The responsibility now sits with you as EHP’s client.

If you as an EHP client cannot meet the outcomes set by the department, one may face enforcement action.

Another major change, one may have noticed is be more frequent site inspections to ensure clients are complying with your licence conditions.

If one can demonstrate that one is consistently meeting the department’s requirements, EHP will inspect them less often.

I recommend one preempt EHP inspections and conduct in-house “pre-audit” inspections and provide EHP with a report.  If one is not meeting licence conditions, EHP is much more likely to carry out more frequent inspections until one lifts one’s performance to a better level.

EHP’s Clients who fail to comply with their licence, may face strong action to ensure the problem is fixed quickly.

EHP has already started making these changes to how we work to better regulate business and industry. Since February 2013 one may have noticed faster turnaround times for licences, fewer conditions, more site inspections, and tougher enforcement action.

For more information on these changes, please read the department’s regulatory strategy now available on the EHP website.

Wandoan Coal

Glencore Xstrata has officially shelved the $7b Wandoan thermal coal project in Qld amid a slump in the coal price, over-supply “and other challenges in the global coal market”.

Back in August 2011, the Mining giant was taken to the Land Court by the community based activist organisation – Friends of the Earth.  Glencore Xstrata was asked to defend the greenhouse impacts of its proposed Wandoan coal mine.  A variety of experts gave evidence concerning the impacts of Wandoan Coal mine on Qld's environment & the global climate. 

Cutting Red Tape for the sake of cutting Red Tape

Earlier this year the Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR) delivered its final report, Measuring and Reducing the Burden of Red Tape, which aimed to identify key priority areas and a structure for achieving regulatory reform in Qld.

The OBPR was set up by the Qld Government soon after the State election to drive regulatory reform.

Key functions of the OBPR are:

·       Assessing the adequacy of proposed regulation using the Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) System.

·   Communicating with government agencies and providing advice on how to ensure that regulatory approaches minimise the burden of regulation.

·     Undertaking reviews of policies and regulations that create a burden for business, government, and the community. The first step in this process involves reporting to Government on a framework for  reducing the burden of regulation

·     Implementing a permanent mechanism for businesses and community organisations to raise issues in relation to any regulatory matters. any regulatory matters

The Qld Government's Response to the OBPR's Final Report on Measuring and Reducing the Burden of Red Tape and Regulation can be found at -http://www.qca.org.au/Obpr/rbr/

The Qld Government has supported, either in full or in part, 98% of the recommendations in the OBPR’s Final Report. The Response provided a framework for achieving the Qld Government’s arbitrary target of reducing red tape by 20%.

The Qld Government appears to be cutting Red Tape for the sake of cutting Red Tape.  In doing so, decision making is being centralised into the Department of State Development and Infrastructure Planning in a way that we have not seen since the early 1980's. 

As part of these reforms, Ministers and Directors-General have been allocated red tape reduction targets for their portfolios.

The Qld Government has begun progressing more than 400 red tape reduction initiatives.  250 of them have been completed. This ranges from major legislative reforms to specific administrative arrangements.

The Qld Government has attempted to reduce costs in domestic dwellings, by removing the requirement for rainwater tanks, six-star energy ratings and electric hot water systems on new homes.

The Qld Government claims to be streamlining the development approvals process, predominantly through changes to elements of planning legislation:

·       The Sustainable Planning and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2012 (SPOLA Act) and the State Assessment and Referral Agency (SARA)

·       A single State Planning Policy

·       Changes to the local infrastructure contributions framework.

One of the first initiatives was the removal the waste levy, in order to save businesses millions of dollars a year in reduced paperwork and compliance costs. However, removal of the waste levee, also led to the loss of the associated waste reduction programs and has led to an influx of waste from interstate.

The Qld Government claims streamlining the approvals process for all Environmentally Relevant Activities (ERA) has saved affected businesses on average $20,000 in application costs, 150 pages of paperwork and 68 days of processing time.

Standard environmental authority applications for certain lower-risk activities are subject to simpler eligibility criteria and standard conditions.  EHP has released the proposed eligibility criteria and standard conditions for 19 prescribed ERAs—including screening, small sewage treatment plants & meat processing—for public consultation.

Standard conditions include performance and outcome based criteria.  For example and put in brief these conditions include:

·     The site must have written procedure/s that:

·       Identifies potential risk during operations and emergencies

·       Establishes control measures to minimise environmental harm

·       Trains staff and reviews performance

·       The site must not cause environmental nuisance at sensitive places (e.g. complaints from neighbours on odour, dust and noise)

·       Noise control includes no auditable noise from 7 pm to 7 am except Sundays from 7 pm to 8 am on to sensitive places such as dwellings, hotels or residential places, schools, hospitals or medical centers.

·       Store all chemicals >15 L in bunds

·       Manage stormwater to prevent or minimise environmental impacts

·       Implement sediment and erosion control measures

·       Store or remove wastewater if soil conditions or wet weather prevent release

·       On site closure the site be rehabilitated and not discharge contamination to waters and the land is safe for fauna and humans

These default conditions are likely to form the basis for the site-specific application.  While simple some can be considered quite strict and should be carefully reviewed. 

Companies looking to operate in Queensland will be facing the new criteria which is generally outcome focused and less concerning on the processes used to achieve these environmental outcomes.

Refer to the Consultation information sheet for further information on preparing your submission.  Submissions close 19 August 2013.

The Government claims that vegetation management reforms give landholders more control over their land and ensure primary producers can get on with growing their businesses without being hindered by unnecessary bureaucracy. 

In 2006, clearing of remnant vegetation to create pastures for agriculture was the principal activity that was stopped and which previously accounted for the vast majority of land clearing.

The high rates of land clearing and habitat fragmentation prior to 2006 in Australia, particularly in Qld, have been identified in State of the Environment reports as the single most significant threat to terrestrial biodiversity in Australia and Qld. For example, the State of the Environment Queensland 1999 reported:

The factor contributing most to the loss of biodiversity in Queensland has been and continues to be the destruction of native habitat by broadscale land clearing. Immediate effects on biodiversity include the removal or killing of species, the most obvious being plants, and the rapid reduction in habitat for other species. Habitat loss is a major factor in loss of woodland bird diversity in Australia: it has been estimated that 1000–2000 birds die for every 100 ha of native bushland cleared

Broadscale land clearing not only reduces the extent and diversity of natural ecosystems but also fragments them into remnant patches that, in many cases, are too small and too isolated to maintain viable populations of species.

Fundamentally, the objective is to change the culture of Government to one that actively reduces red tape, as well as addressing the systemic causes of over-regulation.  It remains to be seen if the pendulum swings too far towards politicized processes or an over-reliance on self regulation

EHP's Performance Assessment

EHP’s Performance Assessment

The June 2013 Public Performance Report is available and provides an overall overview of Department of Environment and Heritage Protection’s self assessment of performance.

Information on the department’s assessment of its current and trending levels of performance in assessing and approving resource and development projects will be regularly published on the EHP website.

Last month, the Qld Government released the 2013–14 State Budget.

The Department of Environment and Heritage Protection’s $171.1m operating budget allocation and $30.1m capital budget includes a number of funding commitments including:

·       $11.7m to continue to increase koala habitat,

·       $10.7m for the protected land acquisitions program.

·       $4m for funding to community groups,

·       $3.7m for the regulation of the coal seam gas industry.

·       $2.5m, as part of a two year $4m commitment, to the Gladstone Healthy Harbour Partnership.

·       $2m as part of a four year $8m commitment, for the SEQ Healthy Waterways program.

The stated objectives for EHP in 2013–14 include:

·       continued measures to cut red tape,

·       implementation of practical programs that uphold environmental standards,

·       funding for grassroots environmental projects across the state.

Further to reforms to the current planning and development, the Qld State Government believes it has made further significant cuts to red tape. The Newman Government’s Resources Cabinet Committee has made it even easier to gain approvals for resources projects.

The Changes aim to streamline the environmental impact statement (EIS) process, which all large resource projects need to complete.

As part of the changes, the Coordinator-General and Department of Environment and Heritage Protection formulated new risk-based, generic terms of reference for EIS processes conducted under the State Development and Public Works Organisation Act 1971.

In practice, the EIS process should identify the same environmental values and propose the same environmental protection commitments that would be found in the Environmental Management plan, but an EIS typically goes into greater detail. The EIS is used by the proponent to develop an EM plan.

At an early stage, terms of reference are developed that provide the minimum expectations for the scope of the EIS. EHP publishes generic terms of reference to assist the development of project-specific draft terms of reference. The draft terms of reference are made available for a minimum period of 30 business days so that stakeholders and any member of the public can review the document and comment on what values, impacts and commitments should be considered in the EIS.

When the proponent has produced the EIS, it too is made available for a minimum period of 30 business days for stakeholders and the public to review the document, and to submit comments on the quality of the proponent’s assessment and commitments.

The aim of the process is to identify all significant impacts and propose all reasonable and practicable measures to protect the environment, before EHP develops the draft environmental authority.  A framework titled Managing the Impacts of Major Projects in Resource Communities, outlines a package of initiatives to assist local government, communities and industry work together to manage the impacts of resource development on regional communities.

A new suite of guidance and support material for applicants developed by EHP aims to help clients complete their application and avoid further information requests from the department. Fully completed applications allow EHP to complete the assessment process more quickly.

The reforms also include a government case management role with industry, state and local government and Local Area Infrastructure Programs (LAIPs) to prioritise community infrastructure investment.

EHP is still involved with the assessment and approval of resource and development projects under the Environmental Protection Act 1994.

During 2012–13 EHP completed environmental impact assessments on projects that, if they progress, will contribute $5 billion in capital expenditure.

In addition, EHP is also conducting assessments for more than 30 major resource project proposals, which will contribute up to $18 billion in capital expenditure.

Enhancements to EHP’s environmental assessment system in 2013 have also resulted in a significant reduction in assessment and approval times for environmental authorities.

In 2012–13 the average assessment timeframe for petroleum, geothermal and greenhouse gas activities was 28 business days, down from 56 business days in the previous financial year.

Waste Management Review

The Environmental Protection (Waste Management) Regulation 2000 expires on 1 September 2013. A review of the regulation has been undertaken and a discussion paper outlining several options is now available for comment.

Submissions close on 22 July 2013. You can email submissions to: Epact.Policy@ehp.qld.gov.au

Contaminated Land Auditors, Green Tape, ERAs and Waste

Contaminated Land Auditors

The Department of Environment and Heritage Protection has established the framework for assessing and approving auditor applications. Individuals applying to be a contaminated land auditor can refer to the draft prescribed guideline and draft prescribed code of conduct when completing and submitting the application form.  There are concerns this will make for a lower standard for contaminated site auditors who will find it easier to get their Qld certification.  Due to interstate licensing recognition requirements Qld qualified auditors will be permitted to operated in all other Australian states.

Green Tape Reduction

The Forms and fees finder: environmental authorities is an interactive web tool developed by the Department of Environment and Heritage Protection to help business and industry understand the requirement for applying for a new environmental authority and managing their existing environmental authorities (for example, amending, amalgamating, transferring and surrendering their environmental authority).

This tool translates the licensing framework for both prescribed environmentally relevant activities (ERAs) and resource activities in the Environmental Protection Act 1994 to a question and answer format.

The tool prompts users to select all their ERAs and identifies their application requirements, from the correct application form and annual fee to which environmental considerations should be covered in an application.

Draft eligibility criteria and standard conditions

The Environmental Protection 1994 allows for standard applications for an environmental authority to be made for certain lower-risk activities. A standard application is one where the activity is subject to eligibility criteria and standard conditions. The Department of Environment and Heritage Protection has prepared 19 sets of draft eligibility criteria and standard conditions for activities such as screening, small sewage treatment plants and meat processing.

The proposed eligibility criteria and standard conditions for the 19 prescribed ERAs have been released for public consultation.

One can use the template and the Consultation information sheet – Draft eligibility criteria and standard conditions for ERAs – Supporting information and making submissions when preparing your submission. Submissions close on 19 August 2013 and can be sent to: Epact.Policy@ehp.qld.gov.au

Waste Management Review

The Environmental Protection (Waste Management) Regulation 2000 expires on 1 September 2013. A review of the regulation has been undertaken and a discussion paper outlining several options is now available for comment.

Submissions close on 22 July 2013. You can email submissions to: Epact.Policy@ehp.qld.gov.au

planning and development in QLD

The Qld Government is reforming the current planning and development system in pursuit of perpetual growth. The changes mean that the chief executive administering the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (Qld) (SPA) has now taken over the assessment manager and concurrence agency roles which were previously administered by the various state agencies.  In effect, State decision making is being centralised to the Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning.

This reform has been driven from consultation with disaffected local governments and property developers.

This comprehensive reform aims to:

·       streamline assessment and approval processes

·       remove red tape

·       re-empower local governments to plan for their communities.

The new planning reform agenda reinforce changes already made through the Sustainable Planning Act 2009.

Key elements of planning reform are:

·       the Sustainable Planning and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2012 (SPOLA Act) and the State Assessment and Referral Agency (SARA)

·       a single State Planning Policy

·       changes to the local infrastructure contributions framework.

SARA will revolutionise the way developers dealt with development applications referred to or assessed by the state.

The Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning is now the single point for state assessment or referral of these development applications.

An ePlan Portal has been introduced to assist councils and state agencies handle planning documents.  It enables local governments to lodge documents, state agencies to access those documents and provide comments, and the department to coordinate the review process for planning schemes and temporary local planning instruments. For more information on the planning reforms visit the DSDIP website.

The Qld State Government has also released a discussion paper outlining options for the reform of the funding framework for local government infrastructure. The discussion paper presents a set of reform options developed from feedback received from key local government and development industry representatives who had participated in recent workshop sessions.

The Qld State Government is attempting to identify the reforms necessary to deliver a framework to support sustainable local governments and a prosperous property development and construction industry.

The public consultation runs from early July until 9 August.