Showing posts with label Aid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Aid. Show all posts

12 May, 2012

Fair Go for the planet?




This week Wayne Swan released the so called #FairGo budget.

My concern is that future generations, developing communities and the other species that we share the biome with, are not getting a fair go.

The Government has decided to defer the achievement of providing 0.5 per cent of Gross National Income to official development assistance by one year.


Australia's Official Development Assistance (ODA) will increase to $5.2 billion in 2012-13 – an increase of $2 billion, or 60 per cent more, since the election of the Labor Government in 2007.

"The allocation in the 2012-13 Budget to ODA will increase by over $300 million from 2011-12 and maintain ODA at 0.35% of Gross National Income (GNI)," Senator Carr said.
"Funding for ODA will continue to grow each year; it will, however, grow at a slightly slower rate so that 0.5 per cent of GNI is achieved in 2016-17.
"Funding for the important work of Australian non-government organisations (NGOs) will also continue to increase with the expansion of the AusAID NGO Cooperation Program to $110 million in 2012/13 and $165 million by 2015/16.
"Consistent with the Government's aid policy 'An Effective Aid Program for Australia: Making a real difference—Delivering real results', announced in July 2011, the Australian Federal Government has now set out a plan which outlines how we will deliver real results for the poor by 2015-16.
The 2012-13 Budget will implement this plan, and over the next four years the plan will:
  • enable 4 million boys and girls to enrol in school and improve the quality of education for 20 million poor children;
  • vaccinate 10 million children and provide access to safe drinking water for over 8.5 million people;
  • provide over 2.3 million poor people with access to financial services; and
  • provide assistance to an estimated 30 million people in crisis situations.
The Federal Government remains committed to achieving the Millennium Development Goals and the aid program will continue to grow in dollar terms.
The 2012-13 Budget implements the Government's new aid policy and will achieve widespread results for the world's poor. 
This aid spending will emphasise our focus on our neighbours, with over 70 per cent of Australian aid delivered in the Asia- Pacific region.
New aid initiatives for Asia and the Pacific in the 2012-13 Budget include:

Closing Development Gaps in East Asia

Australian interests are inextricably linked to a stable and prosperous East Asia.
The Gillard Government will increase assistance to the poorest countries of East Asia, with $208.6 million over four years being invested to improve agricultural productivity and boost health and education services in Burma, Cambodia, and Laos, and to improve resilience to floods and other natural disasters in Vietnam.
This assistance will help over 250,000 students to attain a better education and 60,000 farmers to free themselves from poverty.

Overcoming Poverty and Building Stability in the Pacific

The Federal Government will extend Australia's efforts to overcome poverty and build stability in the Pacific by investing $384.5 million over four years for health, higher education and the particular needs of the micro-states of Kiribati, Nauru and Tuvalu.
Over the next four years, this assistance will result in vaccinations for 41,000 children, strengthen around 60 higher-education institutions across the region to deliver high-quality education, and support 4,000 young people across the Pacific to graduate with recognised qualifications and skills for the workforce.

Continuation of the Pacific Police Development Program

The Federal Government will invest $97.1 million over four years through the Australian Federal Police and Attorney General's Department to assist policing agencies across the Pacific to improve security in our region. This assistance will improve policing skills and leadership, implement community policy projects and communication campaigns, upgrade national police headquarters and academies, and strengthen legal frameworks.

Extension of the AFP commitment to the United Nations Mission in East Timor

The Federal Government will provide $3.5 million in 2012-13 to enable the Australian Federal Police to continue their 50 officer deployment in East Timor as part of the United Nations Integrated Mission in Timor-Leste.

Continuation of Australia's Aid Program in Afghanistan

The Federal Government will invest $190.3 million over two years to continue its aid program in Afghanistan. This funding will put more than 30,000 additional boys and girls in school and build over 100 kilometres of rural roads to provide farmers with better access to markets.
This recognises that strengthening the capacity of the Afghan Government, economy and institutions is essential to ensuring that the gains made to date are not reversed.
Australia will also invest in our global and humanitarian responsibilities:

Strengthening Preparedness and Response to Humanitarian Crises

The Federal Government will invest $435.6 million over four years to strengthen developing countries' preparedness for natural disasters, enhance Australia's ability to respond to disasters in our region and internationally, and build our partnerships with organisations such as the World Food Programme, the International Committee of the Red Cross, the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs and the UN High Commissioner for Refugees.
Natural disasters have an acute impact in developing countries. A person is 25 times more likely to die from a disaster in a low-income country, and countries and communities recovering from disasters and conflict suffer setbacks in economic and social progress.
This is a critical investment in the stability and prosperity of our region, which has suffered 85 per cent of global deaths from natural disasters over the last three decades.

Australia's Development Partnerships with the United Nations

The Federal Government will invest $154.3 million over four years to expand Australia's engagement with UNICEF, UN Women, the UN Development Program, World Health Organisation, UN Population Fund and UNAIDS.
Australia's increased contribution to these organisations will accelerate gains towards the Millennium Development Goals. For example, in 2010 UNICEF responded to 290 humanitarian situations in 98 countries and supported an estimated 573,000 schools in 89 countries.
A recent comprehensive assessment of multilateral organisations (the Australian Multilateral Assessment) determined that these humanitarian and development organisations were performing well, and that Australia could have confidence in their effectiveness.
Australia's investment will multiply the reach and influence of our aid program, enhance our standing as a good international citizen, and help these organisations focus on the needs of poor people in our region.

Development Banks

Consistent with the intent of Australia's new aid policy 'An Effective Aid Program for Australia', Australia is deepening its engagement with effective multilateral organisations including the Development Banks.
During 2012-13, Australia will enhance its role in the Asian Development Bank (ADB) – one of our most important partners in the Asia-Pacific region, and rated in the top tier of multilateral organisations under the Australian Multilateral Assessment.
Australia's pledge in March this year to the ADB positions us to become the second largest donor to this organisation, and will have far reaching results across Asia and the Pacific, including benefitting 1 million students through school improvement programs, and supporting 450,000 households to become connected to water supply.
The Federal Government will also pursue membership of the African Development Bank, signalling Australia's commitment as a long term development partner to Africa, and of the UN's International Fund for Agricultural Development to reduce rural poverty and hunger.




A colleague of mine has trawled through the budget papers to assess the impact of the Federal budget on the environmental agencies and policy in general from a business perspective.


After the pre-budget leaks, it comes as no surprise, that the Federal Climate Change agencies have all faced severe cut backs.

The Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency’s (DCCEE) departmental budget is to be reduced from $145.6m to $104.4m.

More problematic is the cut in appropriations by the DCCEE dropping to $114m next year from $289.5m this year. Key program changes include:
       • Energy efficiency Programs cut from $6.2m to $650K;
       • Solar hot water cut from $42.8m to $500K;
       • Home Insulation Program cut from $170.8m to zero;
       • National Climate Change Adaptation Centre $22.5m to $3m;
       • Natural resource management for climate change new allocation of $7.6m.

With the dissolution of the Office of Renewable Energy Regulator and the creation of the Clean Energy Regulator (CER) and the Climate Change Authority (CCA) the budget allocation is not so straight forward.

However, the CER receives a $92.3m allocation for departmental work and $666.3m for administered appropriations. The CCA has a total allocation of $6.2m.

From a revenue view the Clean Energy Regulator will receive a $75m operational budget from 2013–14 for two years.

My colleage suspects that a large amount of this will be to pay for consultants to review carbon liable companies. Already there is anecdotal evidence of a random audit on compliance with the measurement requirements under NGERS which will set their carbon bill for next financial year.

The budget paper also state that non-transport LPG and LNG will be carbon liable from 1 July 2013. We assume that like liquid fuels an equal drop in excise will apply.

Other key climate change initiatives include:
    • $2.8 million over four years for the Commonwealth's contribution to COAG's building energy
       efficiency activities including:
                                 o $0.8 million for the Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning High      
                                    Efficiency Systems Strategy (HVAC HESS)
                                 o $1.6 million for the National Australian Built Environment Rating System
                                    (NABERS).
    • $3.0 million in 2012-13 to continue a range of climate change adaptation activities.
    • $37.1 million over four years to assist in establishing a nationally consistent legislative
       framework for Greenhouse and Energy Minimum Standards to replace the existing patchwork
       of inconsistent laws

For Tony Burke's Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities changes include:
• $13.2 million cut over seven years to the Commonwealth Environmental Water Office, which will leave it with $126.1m over this period.
• $37.8 million over four years to implement reforms to the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.
• $35.6 million over four years to continue the operation of the National Water Commission.
• $61.2 million cut over two years (for the Driving Reform in the Murray-Darling Basin program leaving $234.2 m to work with.

06 July, 2011

my letter to Teresa Gambaro on the Aid Budget


Teresa Gambaro,
Shadow Parliamentary Secretary for International Development Assistance

Dear Ms Gambaro,


Today Kevin Rudd announced the findings of the first independent review of Australia’s aid effectiveness in 15 years. Kevin also launched Australia's aid strategy though to 2015. Apparently it is about aid effectiveness, value for money and reducing poverty.

It is a little sad to me that our Government has to sell or justify spending taxpayer's money on helping our people, other communities and/or other nations who are suffering from natural & economic disasters, famines, floods, droughts and/or experiencing the consequences of climate change.

Perhaps your previous Government/s did a better job of justifying Aid in order to maintain border security.

The current Federal Government has a tough sell on its hands. Would you please make the task a little easier by publicly supporting effective expenditure on Aid?

Would you also hold the Government to account to ensure that Australian Aid is spent wisely?

your's sincerely,

Rowan Barber
Sanitation Engineer




03 June, 2011

The Australian Civilian Corps

Good afternoon,

The Australian Civilian Corps received an extremely strong response to its recent call for Expressions of Interest, thank you to those who responded. AusAID is again seeking highly motivated and experienced stabilisation and recovery personnel to join the Australian Civilian Corps Register.

The Australian Civilian Corps deploys stabilisation and recovery specialists on fixed term assignments to countries experiencing or emerging from natural disaster or conflict. Typically you will support the Australian Government’s efforts to strengthen governance and state function arrangements, facilitate early recovery processes and prepare the frameworks for longer-term development.

Civilian specialists will:

  • remain in their regular employment until accepting a deployment
  • be engaged as Commonwealth employees when deployed
  • be Australian citizens with at least five years relevant experience
  • have relevant experience within complex environments
  • be able to work in challenging overseas environments
  • typically be deployed for 3 – 12 months to countries recovering from natural disaster or conflict.

The Australian Civilian Corps is seeking stabilisation and recovery specialists in the following areas:

  • Agriculture/livelihoods
  • Education administration
  • Electoral
  • Engineering and planning
  • Health administration
  • Humanitarian aid coordination
  • Law and justice
  • Needs assessment, planning and monitoring
  • Public financial management / economics
  • Public sector management
  • Stabilisation and recovery.

Further information is available on AusAID’s website at www.ausaid.gov.au/acc.

Application enquiries can be made by contacting the recruitment team at Effective People on +61 2 6162 3530 or by email acc@effectivepeople.com.au

Applications close: 6:00 pm (AEST) on Thursday, 23 June 2011

14 May, 2011

international development assistance

I have been trolling through the 2011-12 budget looking for some good news for the environment.

I posted some thoughts here on the state of the environment budget.

Yesterday, I had the honour of hearing the Australian Foreign Minister, Kevin Rudd, bang on about the Official Development Assistance (ODA) Budget

I have a few thoughts that I would like to share with my growing readership. (I think there are nine of you now).

One of the first points that @KRuddMP made yesterday was that: "The power that lies in your hands"

Apparently NGO's lobbying the Torries on maintaining the Aid . was actually successful. It is alleged that this week Tony Abbott dropped a policy statement from his Budget reply speech that linked spending on Aid with budget deficits. This followed an orchestrated campaign by international development NGOs to lobby the opposition members of Parliament.

The next piece of good news is that 82% of Australians support the Aid programme. @KRuddMP alleges that: our (Australia's) natural sense of compassion does not stop at the Continental shelf

It is a sad fact of Australian political life that has to justify the education expenditure in Indonesia on the basis of self interest, just as John Howard did previously. Spending money in the right places for all the wrong reasons.....

discussed & influencing participation in schools. He did not mention the impact that (or lack there of) have on the participation rates of girls once they start to menstruate.

talked briefly about maternal health for women & children without the passion of his lovely wife: Therese_Rein (who spoke recently at an International Midwifery Day event at the Bronco's Leagues Club).

It is another sad fact of Australian political life that discussed the water, sanitation & hygiene () budget, without the passion of Bob McMullan. I suspect the spending on has been cut in real terms with more money allocated but over a longer period of time. Bob McMullan, the former Parliamentary Secretary for International Development Assistance (& former minister in previous Labor Governments) retired at the last election. Bob was not afraid to get his photo taken with a toilet. He was a great advocate for toilets. I miss him dearly.

has a different agenda & a different set of priorities. Australia has ramped up it spending in Africa. The relative amounts being spent in Africa are quite small in the global economic sense & quite insignificant in terms of the problems that need to be addressed.

However, I fear that Australia's engagement in Africa comes at the expense of programmes that were running in Asia Pacific. I fear that AusAid & its partners lack the experience & expertise to be effective in the African context. I have even heard stories of Australian Aid causing more harm than good, when the only Water Resource Officer for a region, is pulled out of his community to participate in Australian sponsored training.

I fear that Australia's engagement in International Development Assistance in Africa has more to do with Australia's ambitions for representation in the United Nations, than anything else.

It is great to see Australia ramp up its funding for tackling easily preventable blindness. It is a shame to see funding for tackling easily preventable diseases through sanitation & hygiene has been cut back (in real terms) & spread a lot thinner.

It is great to hear a focus on eliminating violence against women & acknowledgement of Australia's own issues at home.

wrapped up his discourse with a plug for volunteering & the new Australian Civilian Corps

In question time, @KRuddMP applauded a better relationship between AusAid & NGO's. in response to a question about exorbitant salaries @KRuddMP indicated that salaries & fees to technical specialists have been reduced from ~44% to ~22% of the AusAid budget.


Whilst I see a need for Aid (particularly following disasters & war) & International Development Assistance, I see a future for social enterprise & micro-finance to play a greater role in poverty alleviation.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The 2011-12 Aid Budget at a glance

Total Australian Official Development Assistance (ODA) in 2011-12 is estimated at $4.8 billion, this is equivalent to 0.35 per cent of Gross National Income (GNI).

New aid funding in the 2011-12 Budget will implement the Government’s 2010 election commitments for the aid program on:

· improving access to education,

· better maternal health for women and children,

· access to water and sanitation,

· tackling avoidable blindness,

· eliminating violence against women, and

· Australian volunteers.

In 2011-12 around 89 per cent, of Australia’s aid will be delivered through AusAID, the remainder will be delivered through other Australian government agencies, such as the Australian Federal Police and the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.

Around half of Australia’s aid in 2011-12 is expected to be provided to the Asia Pacific region. The ten countries that are expected to receive the most Australian aid in 2011-12 – Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Afghanistan, Vietnam, East Timor, Philippines, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Cambodia – are all in the Asia Pacific.

Assistance in the education, health and economic growth sectors is expected to comprise more than half of Australian aid expenditure in 2011-12.

AusAID’s humanitarian and emergency related expenditure is estimated to increase to $325.0 million in 2011–12. This will support the United Nations, Red Cross, and other international and Non-Government Organisations (NGOs) to meet humanitarian needs in Asia and the Pacific, Africa and other developing regions.