Shute Harbour Marina

We are encouraged to comment on the proposed $252 million Shute Harbour Marina in the Whitsundays when the Coordinator-General releases the project’s supplementary environmental impact statement (SEIS) on the 16 March 2013.

One had six weeks to comment on the SEIS for a project.

Coming on the back of the approval of the Ella Bay project and following closely on the heels of the Great Keppel Island project approval only a week ago, there is no doubt that the Queensland Government  is driving forward tourism towards a new era in Queensland.

Shute Harbour marina in the current development proposal includes:

·         395 marina berths

·         Retirement resort (70 apartments)

·         Resort hotel (109 suites)

·         Managed resort (52 lots)

·         Community cyclone shelter

·         Indigenous cultural centre

The SEIS followed the release of the original environmental impact statement (EIS) in November 2008 and represented a significant change in the size and scope of the project.

“The proponent, Shute Harbour Marina Development Pty Ltd, was required to provide the SEIS to address a number of issues raised during the public consultation on the original EIS

Issues addressed in the SEIS include the size of the original marina development, impact on marine traffic, and the location of the marina access channel.

The release of the supplementary environmental impact statement is an opportunity for the community to have its say on whether these issues have been adequately addressed.

The Shute Harbour Marina project supplementary information on the EIS, plus more details on the project, can be viewed at www.dsdip.qld.gov.au/shute-harbour-marina

All submissions must be written and delivered to the Coordinator-General’s office by 5pm on Monday 29 April 2013.

EHP’s New Regulatory Strategy

EHP’s New Regulatory Strategy

The Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (EHP) has released a new Regulatory Strategy. This strategy sets out how EHP will carry out its role as the state’s environment and heritage regulator.

The new strategy is a significant change to the department’s approach to regulation, and all clients and their advisors are encouraged to read it. There is also a short video to help explain the changes.

I note a wholesale move towards “A light-handed regulatory model”.  I shall be analyzing and unpacking the implications of this in future posts to this blog.

Ella Bay and Planning Legislation

Ella Bay and Planning Legislation

The Qld Government is committed to “fast tracking” the processing of development applications.

Qld’s biggest-ever tourism development - a $1.4 billion integrated tourism and residential community at Ella Bay, near Innisfail in far north Queensland - has recently been approved by the Qld Government.

The approval of this project was made possible through changes which will be implemented through legislative amendments to the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA).

The EIS process for Ella Bay began in 2005. The current Coordinator-General brought it to a conclusion over the last seven months. The Sustainable Planning and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2012 was passed by Parliament on 13 November 2012.

The Bill enables the Qld Government to fast track development by:

§ improving the coordination and responsiveness of state government in dealing with particular development applications (proposing development within or partially within state jurisdiction);

§ removing master planning and structure planning arrangements;

§ reducing regulatory 'red tape' for development applications involving a state resource;

§ allowing a development application where not all the mandatory supporting information has been provided;

§ providing that certain provisions within the Qld Planning Provisions also apply to local government planning schemes made under the Integrated Planning Act 1997 (repealed)

§ enabling the Planning and Environment Court to order costs in certain circumstances;

§ introducing an alternative dispute resolution process in the Planning and Environment Court for minor disputes which will enable these disputes to be resolved more quickly.

The Coordinator General has granted approval for the Ella Bay project and sent his report to the Federal Minister for Environment Tony Burke for his consideration. Federal Environment Minister Tony Burke said his assessment would be thorough in the 30 business days in which he had to make a decision.

The project proposes the creation of three resort precincts, four residential precincts, a retail village, an 18-hole golf course and a cassowary research and education centre on the site of a 450 hectare cattle property.

The tourist development would comprise 860 units and villas and the residential component 540 permanent residences. The developer has also proposed sustainability measures which include the project being totally water self-sufficient through rainwater capture and recycling, the use of renewable energy resources, with all power to be generated on-site, a number of environmental protection and management programs, and ‘green’ transport options on-site.

The Coordinator-General’s approval is subject to 38 conditions and Satori gaining all statutory State approvals, Commonwealth approval and meeting its commitments listed in the report.  The Coordinator-General’s assessment was based on the proponent’s Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) addressing key issues relating to the cassowary population, water quality and road access, including a 4 kilometre upgrade of the existing Ella Bay Road and a new 880 metre road that will bypass Flying Fish Point. The Coordinator-General’s report can be viewed at: http://www.dsdip.qld.gov.au

State Development Minister Jeff Seeney said he believed environmental concerns, particularly for cassowaries, had been taken into account.

"There is fencing to stop them crossing the road indiscriminately in areas where they might be endangered and then there will be tunnels for them so they can cross under the road in a safe manner," Mr Seeney said.

However, the developer's own report into other cassowary crossings in the region found they were not well used.