Showing posts with label fast tracking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fast tracking. Show all posts

17 September, 2012

Budget, Fast-tracking Development, Land Clearing








Budget

 

This week’s budget formalises the merger of key water entities in South-East Queensland and formalises the end of the Queensland Water Commission.

The Qld State Government has shut down most of Queensland’s climate and Environment initiatives arguing that the Federal Government’s carbon pricing scheme is duplicating this action. .

In Environment and Heritage Protection the State Government has cut around $20m in funding including two large solar energy generation projects.  $12m has been diverted into the Everyone’s Environment grants program.

Minister Powell say the Qld Government is refocusing his department’s core purpose to be a strong environmental regulator facilitating appropriate, sustainable development while also being a protector of Queensland’s heritage.

The Qld State Government aims to be fiscally prudent, pro-environment and pro-business believing that that these elements are not mutually exclusive.



Environmental Protection Regulation Amendment Project

On Friday 24 August 2012, the Temporary State Planning Policy 2/12 Planning for Prosperity (TSPP 2/12) came into effect.

This is the new Government’s first State Planning Policy. The TSPP 2/12 has been introduced as the pre-cursor to a single State Planning Policy that will combine 14 existing State Planning Policies into one.

The new policy is, indeed, concise – only 7 pages long - but its reach appears quite long. The policy’s Preamble explains that it must be reflected in relevant State and local government decision making.


The Queensland Government is fast-tracking development for it four pillars:
  • agriculture
  • tourism
  • mining/resource extraction
  • Construction.  

The TSPP 2/12 then sets forth broad objectives for each industry.

However, the policies do not apply to a local government's assessment of development applications.

TSPP 2/12 requires referral agencies (but not local government assessment managers) to apply the policy at the decision- making stage of assessment, with the aim of protecting land uses and reducing incompatible uses.

While TSPP 2/12’s policies do not apply to the assessment of a development application or assessment of a master plan (TSPP 2/12, ss 1.3.1 and 1.3.2), conflicts with such planning instruments are to be resolved by giving additional weight to:
·       agricultural uses in areas zoned for agricultural uses
·        urban uses in areas zoned for urban uses
·        tourist development shown to be complementary to an area’s environmental, scenic and cultural values
·       mineral and extractive resources development shown to be complementary to an area’s primary intended land use. (TSPP 2/12 s 2.3).

The policy indicates that the Government will facilitate and removal of some costs to development. The policy aims to 'speed not impede' development, allowing developers to maximise the economic potential of projects.

More specifically, TSPP 2/12 applies to the full range of circumstances set out in the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, including a referral agency’s assessment of a development application (TSPP2/12 s 1.3).


In addition, TSPP 2/12 is to be applied in the making or amending of regional plans or local plans, as well as in designations of land for community infrastructure (ss 1.4, 2.1 – 2.3).




Vegetation Management

Minister for Natural Resources and Mines Andrew Cripps announced a strategy that will aim to streamline vegetation management across Queensland.

The management of vegetation is currently regulated by several Acts of Parliament, including:
·         Sustainable Planning Act 2009
·         Vegetation Management Act 1999
·         Nature Conservation Act 1992.

Each Act has a different function and any person proposing to clear vegetation may need approvals under one or more legislation depending upon the geographic area, tenure of the land, whether or not the ecosystem is identified as remnant ecosystem, or if the activity involves rare or threatened plants.

Mr Cripps plans to make reforms to the Vegetation Management Act and underlying regulations to allow landholders to:
• Undertake routine management activities such as vegetation thinning, weed control, fodder harvesting and clearing of vegetation encroachment in accordance with self –assessable codes and without the need to regularly apply for permits;
• Receive exemptions for vegetation management activities undertaken to allow for environmental works, and as part of clean-up operations following natural disasters.

In addition, the Department of Natural Resources and Mines will work with local Natural Resource Management and other groups to create practical Area Management Plans (AMPs).

26 May, 2012

Fast Track








Fast tracking Significant Projects

The Qld Government has started the fast tracking of significant projects and has granted significant project status to the Yarwun coal export terminal in Gladstone. This is a new paradigm with a Co-ordinator General with the unprecedented ability to fast track development.

The Qld Coordinator-General has also given the green light to Rio Tinto’s $1.45 billion South of the Embley bauxite mining extension on Cape York, but the project still needs Federal Government approval. 

Environmental groups such as the Wilderness Society say that the Qld Government's approval of a bauxite mine expansion on Cape York is at-odds with the World Heritage process. Environmental activists have slammed the change, saying it reduces the amount of time given to considering environmental impact or community input.

The project is still subject to Federal Government approval. Federal Environment Minister Tony Burke says he is concerned about the impact of extra shipping on the Great Barrier Reef & wants to make sure there is a proper environmental assessment.

The Qld Government has called on Mr Burke to detail how long he intended to delay the process and make a decision.

The following consultations provide an opportunity for the public to comment or make a submission on significant project proponents' environmental impact statements (EIS) and other initiatives:

·       Arrow LNG Plant                  28 May
·       Central Qld Rail Project        4 June
·       GasFields Commission        25 May
·       Nathan Dam and Pipelines   5 June
·       North Surat-Collingwood Coal Project            28 May
·       North Surat-Taroom Coal Project       28 May
·       Wongai Project                    12 June


Red Tape

One may recall that late last year, Federal Labor received the final report of Dr Allan Hawke’s review of the EPBC Act.  Amongst other things, this report recommended divesting responsibilities to the State Governments, with the action (RHETORIC) of cutting red tape & increasing certainty for business.  

Deputy Premier Jeff Seeney says the cutting down the red tape will mean Qld can take full advantage of the resources boom.

Divesting of Coal Fired Power

The Qld Government has withdrawn its financial support for the Cloncurry Photo Voltaic Solar Farm to achieve savings for the state’s taxpayers of about $5.6 million.  Large-scale solar farms are proven technology and the Qld State Government believes it is up to the private sector to decide whether to invest in, build and operate such projects in Qld.

Should Premier Newman sell Stanwell Corporation and CS Energy to the private sector, for the same reasons that AGL has bought Loy Yang A in Victoria?

The purchase of Loy Yang A will make AGL the equal largest generator of electricity in the Australia.  Up until recently, AGL have pursued a strategy of developing the nation’s lowest carbon intensity in its energy assets, this purchase nearly triples its intensity.

Loy Yang A will act as a “cash cow” for the company, despite the introduction of a carbon price.  AGL propose to use the substantial cash flows to help fund its renewables investment, which it estimates at around $4-$5 billion to meet its share of the renewable energy target. It expects to meet 60-80% that capital cost itself. When one considers the transition from fossil fuels to renewables – taking the cash from an older asset like Stanwell & Tarong Power Stations & reinvesting it in renewable makes sense.

Government supports Surat Basin resource sector growth

The Minister for Natural Resources & Mines: Andrew Cripps has outlined the Qld Government’s plans to support economic growth in the Surat Basin Energy Resources Province.

The Qld Government are looking to the significant thermal coal and coal seam gas (CSG) resources in the Surat Basin to play a critical role in reining in Queensland’s $2.8b budget deficit and reducing the state’s unemployment to 4%.

Conversion of that CSG into liquefied natural gas (LNG) to export from Gladstone is set to make Qld one of the principal suppliers of LNG to the Asia-Pacific region. By 2018 Qld will be the third largest LNG exporter in the world.

Mr Cripps believes the State Government’s role is to strike a policy balance in regions like the Surat Basin that supports growth in the coal & gas sector, protects the environment and respects other land uses like agriculture.

The Minister emphasised however, that rapid growth in the Surat Basin, particularly in CSG production, is not without its challenges.

There is a need for CSG companies particularly to show a commitment to improving their relationship with the agricultural sector and securing the trust of the broader community,” he said.

The Qld Government’s newly established Gasfields Land and Water Commission will play a key role in ensuring CSG companies earn their social licence to operate by respecting landholders and the environment.

Mr Cripps said the introduction of Statutory Regional Plans, especially on the Darling Downs, should also ensure that controversy is replaced by clear planning.