24 August, 2011

Sustainable Business Weekly QLD Edition [Sustainable purchasing, COAG, CSG, EPBC]





Sustainable purchasing and contract management

Every purchasing decision we make as individuals and as representatives of the company that we work for is a political, social and environmental decision.

As individuals and as Sustainability Practitioners, we have to look at how we can influence our supply chains both in forwards and reverse. “Life Cycle” analysis should be part of this process.

Sustainability aspects can be introduced into commercial enterprise and form part of the selection criteria for choosing suppliers. In the same way, promoting one’s Sustainability credentials can help differentiate one’s Company from one’s competitors.

In business, there are ways to build in incentives for one’s suppliers (and customers) to get better outcomes for the environment (otherwise known as a return on environment).

For example, one can set Key Performance Indicators for one’s suppliers with a Risk/Reward component. Things like energy efficiency, water efficiency, heat transfer efficiency all have both economic and environmental implications for a business.

These are example of things one might incorporate in Key Performance Indicators used to measure the performance on one’s contractors or suppliers. One might even offer “gain share” incentives to one’s suppliers to encourage innovation.

Sustainability is often defined as “development which meets the needs of current generations without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs".

However, there is more to sustainability and the responsibilities of Sustainability Practitioners than development. At a macro and a micro level, we have a responsibility to consider Sustainability of our operations, maintenance and purchasing decisions.

COAG

The Qld Premier Anna Bligh attended the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) last week.

The Premier went to COAG wanting to ensure Qld will be looked after in any carbon pricing package. Ms Bligh said while a carbon tax would impact on Qld’s “carbon intensive economy”, she remained committed to supporting emissions reductions.

However the Qld Premier still wants to ensure that Queensland gets the best possible deal out of this package.

When the Qld Premier met with Prime Minister Julia Gillard, this week, there were some very intense negotiations. The Premier is still looking for some sort of improvement.

ASBG notes that Qld (and other State Governments) have had plenty of opportunity to start a transition to cleaner energy generation. Qld actually sold a lot of Stanwell’s renewable energy investments in 2007 and poured a hell of lot of money into carbon capture and storage projects, which have subsequently failed.

Next week we shall have a closer look at the Qld Treasury and Access Economics assessment of the impacts of the Carbon Tax on the Qld Economy.

Coal Seam Gas

This week Coal Seam Gas was never far from the news. The Leader of the Federal Opposition, Tony Abbott, came out (as it were) on Allan Jones’ radio program in support of the right of farmers to exclude coal seam gas exploration and/or mining on their properties. The next day he backed away from that position and it is still unclear what he actually believes.

Malcolm Turnball expressed his concerns for Prime Agricultural Land and the Great Artesian Basin.

Larissa Water has started stirring the pot as a Qld Senator for the Greens Party by pointing out that the Queensland government has not carried out its own analysis of the greenhouse gas emissions produced by coal seam gas,

An internal government briefing document released after a Right to Information request reveals that in February, energy advisors in the Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation admitted there was no comprehensive analysis of coal seam gas emissions available.

It is still unclear whether or not the State Opposition and or the Federal Opposition support open cut coal mining on prime cropping land in the Darling Downs and Central Queensland’s Golden Triangle.

The LNP has asked those with an interest in CSG and sustainable management of our agricultural lands to send in a submission in response to the LNP’s CSG discussion paper.

The EPBC Act

The Federal Government has proposed streamlining the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

When proposing a new development, the EPBC Act currently requires an environmental impact statement (EIS) to be prepared if a threatened species or something of national significance is affected.

The proposed streamlining may put the onus back onto the States to both assess and approve developments. .

In a number of recent cases (like Traveston Crossing Dam), the Federal Government has been the last hope for the environment, after State Governments had recommended a proposal go ahead.

Coal in back in Court

Several Queensland graziers & conservationists have started a legal battle with Swiss mining giant Xstrata.

23 August, 2011

Greg Combet does Stand Up at the Press Club




Just over six weeks ago, on 10 July 2011, the Federal Government announced a plan for a clean energy future.

Today, Greg Combet gave a major address to the National Press Club to review where the policy is up to, how it is tracking, and what the package will do for the Australian economy.

Mr Combet attempted to dispel some of the myths propagated by the Coalition at both the Federal and State levels.

Greg Combet


Given the importance of climate change, the public debate is disappointing to say the least.

Please take the time to watch the speech or share it with friends and family who may be interested to get the facts.





21 August, 2011

QLD, COAG & clean Energy




The Garnaut Climate Change Review—led by Professor Ross Garnaut—was first commissioned by Australia's Commonwealth, State and Territory Governments in 2007, to conduct an independent study of the impacts of climate change on the Australian economy.

The Review's Final Report was released on 30 September 2008. The Report recommended policy frameworks to improve the prospects for sustainable prosperity.

So the Qld Government has had plenty of time to commence a transition to a clean energy future....

This week, The Qld Premier Anna Bligh attended the Council of Australian Governments (COAG).

The Premier wants to ensure Qld is looked after in any carbon pricing package. Ms Bligh said while a carbon tax would impact on Qld’s “carbon intensive economy”, she remained committed to supporting emissions reductions.

However the Qld Premier still want to ensure that Queensland gets the best possible deal out of this package.

When the Qld Premier met with Prime Minister Julia Gillard, this week, there were some very intense negotiations. The Premier is still looking for some sort of improvement.

I note that Qld (and other State Governments) have had plenty of opportunity to start a transition to cleaner energy generation.

Could somebody tell me why the QLD Government divested itself of wind assets in 2007?








16 August, 2011

Riparian Zone Clearing




Riparian Zone Clearing A few weeks ago, the Qld State Government received the Interim Report of Flood Commission of Inquiry & committed to implementing every one of the 104 recommendations. There are around 30 recommendations pertaining to the operation of dams as flood mitigation and/or potable water storages.





The Commissions of Inquiry order under which the Commission was established requires the provision of an interim report – by 1 August 2011 on matters associated with flood preparedness, to enable early recommendations to be implemented before next summer’s wet season.




The report endeavours to make recommendations which can be put into effect in time to provide some safeguards should flooding recur this summer. It also deals, particularly where dam operations are concerned, with work which cannot be completed by summer, but the commencement of which was not to be delayed until the Commission’s final report is provided.




This week news spread like wildfire through various South East Qld Water Catchment Management Groups, that the Lockyer Valley Regional Council (LVRC) were clearing riparian zones in the Lockyer Valley.




To put this in context, the floods of December 2010 and January 2011 strained the resources of a state more used to coping with drought than flood.
The consequences of the floods were shocking. No-one could have believed that people could be swept by a torrent from their homes and killed, as they were in Grantham. Nine motorists could be drowned in the attempt to negotiate floodwaters




The terms of reference were extensive. The Commissioner was asked to inquire into the preparation and planning for the flooding by governments at all levels, emergency services and the community.




In Section 7.3.1 of the commission of inquiry’s interim report, it states that the Locker Valley Regional Council (LVRC) should develop a plan for the removal of debris. When conducted clearing under a debris removal plan, the Council would have needed to gain approval from the Department of Environment and Resource Management (DERM) to remove existing live vegetation in line with Section 7.3.1.




Since the January flood the green light has been given to clear Black Fellows Creek (20 klms already cleared) and parts of Tenthill Creek. Apparently significant parts of Murphy's and Flagstone Creeks are also being cleared.




One of the main sources of the problem is the wording of the recommendation. If one actually reads the text that was used to form that recommendation it says as follows:
"As Dr Jordan, an expert hydrologist consulted by the Commission, observed in evidence, it seems unlikely that vegetation growing in or immediately adjacent to watercourses contributed significantly to the amount of debris washed downstream as compared with the amount of debris comprised of other vegetation stripped from land beyond creek beds and banks and, of course, man-made objects.122"




The wording of the recommendation isn't an accurate reflection of this.
"7.4 Lockyer Valley Regional Council should immediately develop a plan for the removal of debris, man-made and natural, from waterways in the Lockyer Valley and put it into effect so as to minimise the risk should flooding recur in the coming wet season."





It would appear Lockyer Valley Regional Council have over stepped the mark. There are also systemic failures on the part of the Department of Environment and Resource Management (DERM). ASBG will watch with interest at how DERM respond to this situation.


Optimism Last week The QLD Premier addressed the QLD Media Club. One can read the transcript on the QLD Government’s website.
The premise of her speech was her yearning to counter some of the negative messages coming form both sides of politics, with some messages of hope and optimism.
She said that she did not believe either side of politics would stop the “scrutiny” of each other’s policies.




Restriction of Mining Exploration Apparently, no mining exploration will be allowed in and around urban areas of Queensland, including regional centres such as Ipswich, Toowoomba, Beaudesert, Rockhampton, Mackay and St George Queensland Premier Anna Bligh said today, after a new policy was considered by Cabinet.


The Premier said an exploration Restricted Area would be declared over land bound by the South East Queensland Regional Plan as well as other regional centres and towns with a population of 1,000 or more ( as defined by the Australian Bureau of Statistics).

Gas In Qld and Western Australia the State Governments are throwing a lot of weight, money and recourses behind the promotion of their respective gas industries.


Gas is being pitched as a “clean” fuel with less greenhouse gas intensity.

ASBG is all for a transition to sustainable energy with minimal disruption to economic activity, but there are still a lot of questions to be answered about the “life cycle” impacts of gas and the rationale of substituting one fossil fuel for another.

11 August, 2011

Forum to find ways to grow a stronger Brisbane

The following Press release came from the Qld State Government in August 2011.

I suspect they are barking up the wrong tree....

There seems to be very little in any of the Qld State Government Strategies on how to transition our society to be resilient in the face of the challenges of Climate Change and/or Peak Oil......






Agriculture, Food and Regional Economies
The Honourable Tim Mulherin
11/08/2011
Forum to find ways to grow a stronger Brisbane

Brisbane residents are being urged to attend a public forum on Monday night to share their ideas on new plans to help shape the South East's future.

The State Government has released three visionary long-term planning documents that aim to strengthen the state's regions: the Queensland Regionalisation Strategy (QRS), the Queensland Infrastructure Plan (QIP), and the Bruce Highway Upgrade Strategy (BHUS).

Minister for Regional Economies Tim Mulherin said the government now needed Queenslanders to share their ideas on the plans.

"These are exciting times as we move to shape the growth of every region across the state over the next 20 years and beyond," Mr Mulherin said.

"Given the importance of these plans it's vital they reflect the views, values and opinions of the locals who live and breathe these areas.

"That's why we're holding this forum in Brisbane - specifically to hear from local residents.

"This is your opportunity to share your ideas directly with senior government ministers, provide feedback on the plans, and participate in consultation workshops."

Mr Mulherin said South East Queensland was one of Australia's fastest-growing metropolitan areas, contained within just 1.3 per cent of the state's area.

"By 2031 this region is expected to grow from just under 3 million people to nearly 4.4 million," he said.

"While we are encouraging people to reside in other areas of the state, we have to recognise that many people will continue to want to live in the south-east corner.

"This means we have to continue to build on the region's current strengths - that of the area being the service centre and skills, distribution and logistics hub for regional supply chains - while developing new opportunities.

"South East Queensland is a significant tourism destination and the gateway to the rest of Queensland, and we want to boost food processing, mining services and mining technology capabilities to service regional industries.

"Other ways to improve the region's prosperity will focus on it being a key hub for Queensland's service economy, with specialised skills in professional services such as information and communications technology, and biomedical services.

"Some of the priority projects that will help drive the region are Cross River Rail, Ipswich Motorway upgrade, Airport Link, Moreton Bay Rail Link, Springfield passenger line (Richlands to Springfield), the Smart State Medical Research Centre, Queensland Police Academy, the Southern Queensland Correctional Precinct, the Queensland Children's Hospital, expansion of the Ipswich and Princess Alexandra hospitals, and the Port Connect (Lindum Road - Pritchard Street) project."

The Brisbane Way to Grow forum will be held from 4.30pm for 5pm start (until 7pm) on Monday, August 15 at the State Library of Queensland, Cultural Centre, Stanley Place, Southbank.

Register your attendance by emailing waytogrow@qld.gov.au or calling 1800 093 903, and to view the documents go to www.qld.gov.au or call the number above.

Community consultation on the documents runs until September 9, 2011.

misplaced optimism




The following video shows a buoyant, Qld Premier with hope & faith for the future of Queensland.

Her faith is based on a future fueled by coal seam gas, extracted from Western Queensland, piped to Gladstone, liquefied & shipped to energy hungry markets in Asia.

I suspect the Queensland Premier has forgotten about Ecologically Sustainable Development.

I too have cause for optimism but it is founded on the hope I have in a group of men & women engaged in finding real solutions to humanitarian problems founded on appropriate technology, knowledge transfer: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-08-01/engineers-expand-their-borders/2817528







Here is the transcript:

PREMIER ANNA BLIGH: Well thank you very much for that introduction, I think, Patrick. It's great to be here with the media club and your sponsors and supporters and I join with others and thank those people who have been partners with media club. I do actually think journalism is important, and good journalism is important, and the work they do to foster young journalists is a very important part of the work of the Queensland press gallery, or media gallery - whichever one it is they want to be called at the moment.

I am pleased to be here. I do understand, from some of the traffic in the twitter-verse in the last few days that the media locally has missed me while I've been gone. So it's good to be back.

When I was planning what I was going to say today I began by looking for some of the best data to tell the powerful Queensland story of the last decade. I wanted to tell you a story not just about what Queenslanders have achieved, but what Labor has achieved working with industry and the community, and what we've delivered to Queensland, how we've transformed it - to capture what I think is a great story full of momentum & excitement. And, it's a very easy story to tell. The jobs, the growth, the major industrial projects, the infrastructure. The companies that are now headquartered here; the deepening relationship with India and China. And then there's the social side. The schools. The huge steps in education. The hospitals. Public transport. The shift in arts & culture. And so much more. In short, Queensland has experienced a decade of intense modernisation. And the next chapter offers even more to build on that terrific story.

But then I reflected on the current public mood, what I think is an increasingly rancorous public debate, the pall of gloom that seems frankly to be settling over us. And it seems to me that the yawning gap between how the world sees us & how we see ourselves, between the bright promise & the public mood is actually of more interest, and frankly of more concern. I've been in this game long enough to know that everything that my colleagues and I say and do will be closely scrutinised. And that's a good thing. Scepticism is a fine thing. It keeps my trade honest.

But I think the public mood at the moment is well beyond scepticism. It seems to me that a deeply entrenched cynicism appears to be taking root. And I think that should worry all of us. There's a huge gap, and a growing gap, between the world that I can describe - using official statistics and company reports - and the one that much of the public feel that they live in in Australia at the moment. You all know that as well as I do. The media- you talk to them, all of you listen to them on talk back radio, you see the data about consumer confidence. As Reserve Bank Governor Glenn Stevens said a couple of weeks ago: "It seems we are, at the moment, mostly unhappy." That's certainly how it sounds if you're out there listening in the, to the public discourse.

Yet, is it really that bad? The US, Britain, the Eurozone - all great economies - are all struggling to escape the effects of the GFC and we've seen that played out all week. However, here in Australia, we dodged that bullet more successfully than just about any other western country or economy - because we were stronger, we were more stable and we'd taken the right decisions. But our continued growth just seems at the moment to make us more anxious. Rather than being emboldened by our economic success in recent years, Australians appear to fear that it just means that we are riding for a bigger fall. Laurie Oakes reflected on this in a recent column. He talked about the very negative tone of much of talkback radio and then said: Compare that with the latest Australian National University poll on the nation's political mood, issued last week. This respected survey found a large majority satisfied with the direction in which Australian's, Australia is headed. That's right - - satisfied. To be exact, 51 per cent of Australians describe themselves as "satisfied", 11.8 per cent as "very satisfied". Another 9.5 per cent say they are neither dissatisfied nor satisfied. That means that almost three-quarters of the population are either happy with the country's direction or they don't have any gripe with it.

So, what's at the heart of this disconnect? Many, of course, would blame the media but I think it's the laziest of responses to blame the messenger. What is in the media, reflects what real people are saying. The fact that the Courier Mail has been running a "Let the Sunshine" campaign. a "Let the sunshine in" campaign all year is a clear indicator that the need to lift spirits is widely felt. So, why is the public discourse so different, and so much more pessimistic than the mood identified by the ANU survey? Well frankly, I blame politics and politicians. It's. some people in the media will be refreshed by that. It's not just the negativity. I know that it's the job of oppositions to oppose and of course a good critique of your opponents is central to politics. But there's something different happening in some of the current debates. It seems to me there's a growing deliberate attempt to engender fear and discontent. I think it's one thing to oppose a carbon tax in parli ament, in the press and in the public. All's fair in love and war and politics and we should be out there debating something as big as this. But it's another thing entirely to go into coal and steel communities, as some have done, and deliberately scare families. Deliberately seeking people out only to tell them that they are facing the prospect of losing their jobs, it seems to me reprehensible behaviour.

An LNP member yesterday tweeted: "World finances in melt-down. Labor at helm, could it get worse?" And I thought, well yes actually, it could get a lot worse. Ask the millions of Americans facing unemployment. Ask the Londoners cleaning up their streets today and the young people there who are facing 30% youth unemployment. Ask the Greeks, an ancient civilization, facing loss of sovereignty because they cannot pay their debts. And I thought, if I had to think about where I wanted to be as the world faced some more uncertainty, I can't think of any other country on earth I'd rather be doing it from. Why does all of this matter? Well, because fostering a community of discontent and complaint does not lead to state or country's prosperous future. Whipping up unfounded concerns amongst ordinary people is not just part of the rough and tumble of campaigning - it seems to me a new thing. It seems to me that we are engaging in it in a way that I haven't seen before. It seems a de liberate politics of pessimism, discontent and complaint. It is destructive & fundamentally weakens us. I think it has to be rejected and there are very good reasons for doing that.

It is a mark of progressive politics that on the centre left we believe that hope beats fear. But politics of course is a contest. And it is the job of leaders to make the case for optimism. And not just make it, but to keep making it and making it until it starts to capture and inspire people. Let me ask you a blunt question: Does anyone here think that Australia's greatest days are behind it? Or that Queensland's are? Of course not. Earlier this year the Economist had a special report on Australia - many of you will have seen it - where we were described as the next golden state. Their conclusion? Their conclusion was that Australia could become a model nation, but that we face a profound choice. Their view was that Australians must now decide what sort of country we want for their children to live in. they want. They can enjoy their prosperity or they can actively set about creating the sort of society that other nations envy and want to emulate. And we do face, I think , two paths.

We can allow ourselves to be limited by a gloomy national mood and a poisonously depressing public debate. Or we can start to see ourselves more as the world sees us - a young nation, blessed with resources and human talent. Yes, our mining sector was dramatically impact by the floods of the past summer, and yes volumes in mining exports are down by 11%, but not so loudly reported is that the value of those volumes in the coal sector is forecast to increase by 30 per cent and locked in contract prices for metallurgical coal have increased by 65% in the last 12 months. So while we've seen those disasters have an impact on volume, in fact we're going to see an increase in value in this financial year. And yes, retail sales are flat, but these accounts that we see reported account for only 40% of all consumer spending, and it doesn't include spending on services or cars, and it doesn't tell you that in July this year car sales jumped by 12%. On the back of a massive boost in investment in the resources sectors of Western Australia and Queensland our country is once again poised on the cusp of significant economic boom. But as Ross Gittens, just last week wrote, "Is it possible for a country that is the envy of the developed world to talk itself into recession? I don't know. But it seems we're about to find out", he says. He goes on to say, "If the underlying reality of the economy is enviably good why are we so dissatisfied and anxious?"Well, not because the media are revelling in the bad news and forgetting to mention the good. They always do that. That's Ross Gittens, not me. It's just that, when we're in an optimistic frame of mind we ignore the gloom mongering, whereas when we're in a pessimistic mood we lap it up; and because we're such herd animals we tend to contract these moods from one another. So it seems to me, the challenge for us all at the moment is to find a way to use the reality to shift the underlying psychology. To lift our confidence and restore our faith in our ability to realise the promise that is before us. And that goes back to role that I, and other leading politicians - frankly on all sides - have to play.

In the place of a politics of pessimism we need a politics of optimism. That, I believe, is actually the key test of leadership in modern Australia. And of course, lifting the mood, creating a politics of optimism, has to start with words: Lifting, inspiring, giving confidence - Starting to talk more with the language of enlargement. Of course those words then have to be backed by action. If Ross Gittens is right about herd behaviour, then it seems to me that Queensland has the chance to grab the momentum of the national agenda and to grab the chance to turn the national herd around. Politics is always about change. And in Queensland politics there's no doubt there is a mood for change.

But the question is - change to what & why? Not change for change sake, but change for a purpose. In my experience of Australian politics, it is by and large Labor that is the restless party of change, always searching for new & better ways. Over the past decade, Labor Governments in our state have delivered change that has transformed and modernised Queensland. And going forward the future can be just as good. Let's take just take one area, which is likely to be a hotly contested one over the next 6 months and that's the emerging LNG industry. This is an industry of the future. Global demand for LNG will grow by 130% by 2020. And Queensland is brilliantly positioned to become an Asia pacific hub for cleaner energy, based not only on renewable and biofuel, but on cleaner gas. Three of the nine LNG projects being constructed globally are happening in Queensland. We account for 30% of the new global effort in this sector. The facts on their own, I think, are very pow erful - a whole new export industry, $ 45 billion worth of committed new private investment, jobs for 18,000 people, $750 million a year in new State revenue to fund better services when this starts to be exported. On their own each of these is, I think, a remarkable fact. But, of course, the plural of fact is not vision. Vision is what people need to help them understand the world that we're not only in, but the world that we can and, can make and are making. It seems to me very emblematic of the dominant mood at the moment that the remarkable opportunity of LNG is being seen more in terms of its problems than its promise. Of course there are problems with any new industry, of course there are hurdles and of course there are challenges - they are real & they must be dealt with. But I look at this debate and ask myself, where is the get up & go spirit of my Queensland, the brave and bold belief that we can overcome any hurdle, that we can meet any challenge that is s et in our path? When I called upon that spirit during the disasters of last summer, it was not out of any deliberate or conscious attempt at what you might call "Statriotism." It came from an instinct, firstly, that we needed to rally ourselves and that I had to lead the charge at that time. But the form that it took came from my belief that we are in fact just a little different here in Queensland, in the best possible sense. It's my view that our social & political history is deeply rooted in the frontier experience and that, in turn, fuels our sense of who we are and what we're capable of - and that we draw upon that, and we often do, to galvanize ourselves. Those who have come to Queensland to make it their home, whether they've done that in the last century, the century before or the last decade, have done so because they came looking for a better life, they've uprooted themselves, they've uprooted their families and they've come here to try and make it. We are the State more Australians move to than any other, and they do that precisely because of the promise that Queensland offers. And sure, we've been knocked around a lot lately. This hasn't been an easy couple of years but, my view, it is time for Queensland to reclaim its mojo.

The rest of Australia may have cause for gloom, but our horizon is full of more promise than ever. We are perfectly positioned between the two fastest growing economic regions in the world, Asia and Latin America, and we are set to sell into those vast economic, vast growing regions. We are set to sell ideas, cleaner energy, food security, bio medical solutions, international education and a great holiday destination. It's a pretty good recipe globally right now. Talk of the new LNG industry and the looming mining boom has given rise to concerns about a two speed economy and those concerns then fuel fears that our prosperity will not be shared, that many will miss out, just as others are making it big time. If you embrace the politics of optimism I think that means not accepting that a two speed economy as inevitable. With optimism we become brave and we can see ourselves as the architects of our future. With optimism comes confidence. We don't have to simply accept that a patchwork Queensland economy is inevitable - we can shape it differently. As regions like central Queensland, the south west and the Bowen and Gallilee basins boom ahead in leaps and bounds they are crying out for labour and skills. Similarly, as regions like Far North Queensland, the Gold Coast and the Fraser Coast continue to struggle out of the GFC, they are battling higher unemployment and economic doldrums and they are crying out for opportunities. Left to the market, these differences may well be exacerbated. But there is enormous potential for these coastal regions to play a big part in the success of other regions. There is a tremendous opportunity for cities like Cairns, Gold Coast and Hervey Bay to become home base to the thousands of workers that are driving those huge projects. Many of these workers will be fly in fly out workers, others will be driving just down the road. While in Rockhampton this week it was clear that investment is flowing into large scale ac commodation developments and all of that is happening on the back of what is happening in Gladstone. And there is every reason for all of our tourism hot spots to actively market holiday and investment opportunities to those who are earning higher wages on those research, resource project in the those central Queensland regions.

That's why next week I'll be calling a summit of mining companies and regional mayors. We need to seize these opportunities that are there by playing an active, and a very interventionist role where appropriate. The size and scale of what is happening demands a central co-ordinating role for the State and that's what I intend to lead over the coming months.

More than spread the economic sunshine around more evenly, a well targeted effort at recruitment and training in some of our struggling regions can help to knit us together as we ride the next wave. It can help to ensure that all parts of the State are connected to it and feel they are benefitting from it.

Too often we're presented with the view that we live in two Queensland's:

* City versus country.
* North versus south.
* Regional versus the South East
* Mining versus agriculture.

But if we are going to realise the opportunity, if we're going to reach our full potential, if we're going to as good as we can be, we have to be one Queensland and we have to see ourselves like that. Strong and united.

I know that I face a very tough fight at the next election, probably the toughest of my career. But I have to say, I relish that. It's a fight worth having. It's a fight for a very exciting time in Queensland's future. And it's a fight that I intend to lead with vision and optimism. The future of Queensland requires us to believe in ourselves. It requires, in fact I think demand, that we shake off the politics of gloom and get excited about what's in front of us. We need to see the hurdles that are there as opportunities and we need to find ways to clear them. As Premier, I have the view that you have a responsibility to lead Queenslanders along a path to a better tomorrow, a responsibility not to just to talk about a bright future, but to set in place the conditions to make it a reality. Rhetoric alone won't pass muster. It has to be based on the reality of opportunities and decisions that you're then prepared to make and then see through. The talk of optimism, means tell ing the bush, squarely and honestly, that we will support LNG, but with the right conditions. The talk of optimism means telling regional mayors that projects will go ahead, but that some workers will prefer to live in another region. And the talk of optimism means building new infrastructure, and then being prepared to be upfront with communities that they will be disrupted while projects, such as Australia's largest road project progresses. No negative mind-set can lead us into that future - it never has. Queensland has never walked forward with a negative view. Walking backwards, and undoing reforms don't take you forward. This is fundamentally, in my view, about our attitude, it is about our state of mind. We can, as Ross Gittens says, sentence ourselves to herd mentality or we can decide we want to lead the pack. And if Queensland changes its mind about where we're going and embraces that opportunity, my view is the rest of the country will be following. Big challenge, and frankly I reckon we're up to it.

10 August, 2011

Look what they've done to Tenthill Creek
















Like many others, I am trying to raise awareness of what is happening in SEQ to the riparian zones since the January flood.










I received this information and photos from a concerned resident in the Lockyer Valley who has been trying to prevent the Lockyer Valley Regional Council from clearing the whole of Tenthill Creek.










Much of the Lockyer Valley catchment has been cleared for farming purposes in the last 30 years, leaving very little natural vegetation in creeks.










Since the January flood the green light has been given to clear Black Fellows Creek (20 klms already cleared) and parts of Tenthill Creek,










I understand significant parts of Murphy's and Flagstone Creeks are also being cleared.










The Council appears to have very little understanding of how creek flood mitigation works. There is some hysteria, I suspect as an excuse and no real guidance has been provided by hydrologists.










The Lockyer Valley Regional Council (LVRC) and other Govt agencies have acted like environmental vandals.










Some Lockyer Valley residents have demanded creeks be cleared of vegetation in their submissions to the Flood Inquiry.






The Council and some farmers seem to have little or no interest in the protection or maintenance of creek riparian zones in this region. It has been reported that local farmers say all vegetation in creeks is rubbish and they want creeks maintained like drains.















This creates barren wastelands where creek eco systems should be. This week, Mayor Steve Jones said the Flood Inquiry Commission has requested a plan be produced to ensure all flood debris be removed from creeks in the Lockyer Valley before the next wet season. He also said he thought this was the most important recommendation to come out of the Inquiry (Gatton Star 3 August 2011).






I think this means bulldozers will be entering all the creeks in the Lockyer Valley/SEQ and clearing them wholesale. With the Flood Commission apparently providing no provisions for the protection of the riparian zones or common sense, creeks in the Lockyer Valley are likely to all turn into long, dusty drains. Fast running creeks during flooding can cause serious erosion, flash flooding further downstream and significant silting of weirs.






I can't believe this is happening in 2011, when there is so much knowledge about the effects of land clearing on stream quality and of the need to maintain natural creek beds to slow down heavy creeks flows, particularly in upper and middle catchments. Are you interested in doing something, to counter the push to turn SEQ creeks into dirt drains?










I'm interested in raising the issue more publically.










It breaks my heart to see what bulldozers have already done.










I can't imagine what is coming if LVRC have Govt sanction to 'clean up the creeks of debris' before the next wet season.






There is good sensible legislation in place to protect riparian zones in Qld which is not being explained or enforced.









This is what it used to look like:









01 August, 2011

The Case for Purified Recycled Water






The Case for Purified Recycled Water
Today the Qld State Government received the Interim Report of Flood Commission of Inquiry & committed to implementing every one of the 104 recommendations. There are around 30 recommendations pertaining to the operation of dams as flood mitigation and/or potable water storages.

What is missing from the recommendations is the most obvious solution to balancing the need to mitigate floods and the need to store water for potable water supplies: indirect potable reuse of purified recycled water.
If the State Government was to close the loop (to some extent) by returning purified recycled water to Wivenhoe Dam, it could reduce the amount of water in the dam by over 50%.

The State Government spent billions of $’s to build the infrastructure required for indirect potable reuse. This infrastructure includes three world-class advanced water treatment plants—located at Bundamba, Gibson Island and Luggage Point—and more than 200 kilometres of pipeline. Most of this infrastructure is running on idle.

While recycling water provides an obvious solution to securing water supplies for SE Qld, there are added benefits. Bundamba Advanced Water Treatment Plant has the capacity to treat the reverse osmosis concentrate, to remove phosphorus and nitrogen before being discharged into the Brisbane River and Moreton Bay.

The discharge releases from the advanced water treatment plants would result in much lower nutrient levels into the environment than current discharges from existing wastewater treatment plants, IF the State Government operated these plants as they were designed.

While we should be reducing water consumption, we should also recycle the waste water that we do generate.

Sustainable Business Weekly QLD Edition [The case for IPR, Gold Coast Water, Clean Energy]





The Case for Purified Recycled Water

Today the Qld State Government received the Interim Report of Flood Commission of Inquiry & committed to implementing every one of the 104 recommendations. There are around 30 recommendations pertaining to the operation of dams as flood mitigation and/or potable water storages.

What is missing from the recommendations is the most obvious solution to balancing the need to mitigate floods and the need to store water for potable water supplies: indirect potable reuse of purified recycled water.

If the State Government was to close the loop (to some extent) by returning purified recycled water to Wivenhoe Dam, it could reduce the amount of water in the dam by over 50%.

The State Government spent billions of $’s to build the infrastructure required for indirect potable reuse. This infrastructure includes three world-class advanced water treatment plants—located at Bundamba, Gibson Island and Luggage Point—and more than 200 kilometres of pipeline. Most of this infrastructure is running on idle.

While recycling water provides an obvious solution to securing water supplies for SE Qld, there are added benefits. Bundamba Advanced Water Treatment Plant has the capacity to treat the reverse osmosis concentrate, to remove phosphorus and nitrogen before being discharged into the Brisbane River and Moreton Bay.

The discharge releases from the advanced water treatment plants would result in much lower nutrient levels into the environment than current discharges from existing wastewater treatment plants, IF the State Government operated these plants as they were designed.

While we should be reducing water consumption, we should also recycle the waste water that we do generate.




Gold Coast City takes back its Water Utility

The Qld State Government will not stand in the way of Gold Coast City Council’s decision to split from its water business Allconnex.

The State Government will respect the Gold Coast City Council’s decision and now they need to live with the consequences.

The State gave South East Qld councils the opportunity to take back their water businesses so they could take some responsibility for the ongoing blame game for water pricing.

Gold Coast City Council will now have to prove to their ratepayers that they can provide water cheaper by taking back the water business.

The Gold Coast City Council will be required to provide a price mitigation plan to the State Government by 1 August. This plan must be published by 1 September 2011.

The State Government has already introduced a CPI cap on water prices over the next two years and recently announced a proposal to allow Councils to have representation on their water boards.


Clean Energy Legislation

Last week the Australian Federal Government released the drafts of the key bills forming the Clean Energy Legislative Package. In the coming months the Government will introduce these bills to Federal Parliament. The release of the legislation is a key milestone, but the devil is in the detail.

ASBG is currently working with Norton Rose and other ASBG members to analyse what the Clean Energy Future Plan will achieve & what impacts it may have on ASBG members.

The Australian Federal Government’s plan is intended to cut carbon pollution and drive investment in clean energy technologies and infrastructure.

The package includes a price on greenhouse gas emissions and a series of grants & subsidies. It also sets out how the price on pollution will be run, and what businesses will have to do. The intention of the price on pollution is to make energy produced from polluting fuels cost more than energy produced by clean technology. The intention is to create incentives for companies to invest in cleaner energy.

It is clear that the Federal Government perceives that gas is a “cleaner” fuel than coal.

The Federal Government is trying to preserve or protect jobs in some sectors by providing for assistance to emissions intensive and trade exposed industries through the Jobs and Competitiveness Program.

The most emissions-intensive, trade-exposed activities will initially be eligible for free permits representing 94.5 per cent of industry average carbon costs.

This will apply to manufacturing activities like aluminium smelting, steel manufacturing, flat glass making, zinc smelting and most pulp and paper manufacturing activities.

Activities which have lower levels of carbon pollution, such as some plastics and chemical manufacturing, tissue paper manufacturing and ethanol production will be eligible for free permits to cover 66 per cent of the industry average carbon costs.

Liquefied Natural Gas projects will also receive a supplementary allocation to ensure an effective assistance rate of 50 per cent.

The plan is to provide land holders access to new income opportunities by linking the carbon price to the Carbon Farming Initiative and to credible schemes overseas.



Paperless Office?

Are you reading the Australian Sustainable Business Weekly on a screen or on a piece of paper? Where does your paper come from?