02 November, 2012
I give a shit! Do you?
The WTD is a day to raise awareness of how much there still is to do to ensure that billions of people around the globe have access to good sanitation.
However, World Toilet Day is also a day to celebrate the good work that is being done and what has been achieved already. One way to contribute with the World Toilet Day is to share your experiences from the last year.
So the question is: Since the last World Toilet Day in 2011, what experience, activity or event that you were part of, etc that signals that progress is happening stands out for you?
If you have something to share, please send up to 250 words to P.Bongartz@ids.ac.uk and, if possible, a photo (separately in a jpg file) to go along with what you have written about.
The responses will be compiled and posted them on the website on World Toilet Day.
Deadline: Tuesday, 13th November
Check out the World Toilet Day Website
12 July, 2012
Toilet 2.0 - the next Generation
In recent years we have seen a transition from analogue radio and television to digital services.
Smarter telephone technologies including video and net based applications are complementing the traditional voice down a copper wire.
Automotive companies are starting to roll out electric vehicles to replace internal combustion engine technologies.
These processes are transitional.
Prototypes were developed. They begin as pilot projects, to prove the concept.
This is exactly what is proposed for developing Toilet 2.0 technologies.
The rationale for source segregation is to encourage nutrient recovery and reduce to costs and environmental impacts of the tradition method of aggregating urine and feaces with vast quantities of flush water, grey water and trade waste.
We need to identify pilot projects, to demonstrate the concepts of source separation of urine and feaces.
We need to develop the supporting processes, the institutional arrangements and encourage the social acceptance of the paradigm shift.
We need to develop trade waste policies and charges that incentivate and support source segregation.
Using traditional toilet technologies, there is a peak load of nitrogen, phosphorus that coincides with a hydraulic peak load, every morning and evening.
We need business models and a business case that demonstrates the value of source segregation. There is a potential for delaying large capital investment for infrastructure upgrades by reducing the peak loads. There are opportunities to reduce or avoid the operational costs at sewage treatment plants by reducing the need for energy intensive, biological and chemical processes for removing nitrogen and phosphorus.
The Toilet2.0 technologies provide an opportunity to lower the costs of delivery of sewage treatment services and increase the opportunities for resources recovery, energy efficiency, water efficiency and better environmental outcomes.
If Toilet2.0 technologies can be developed and demonstrated in my community, there is a huge market potential to meet the needs of 2.6 billion people who lack access to any form of toilet.
06 June, 2012
service
I am convinced that one finds happiness by losing oneself in the service of others.
On this occasion, it was a bloke called Chris, serving my wife and I. Chris must be very happy.
My beloved wife and I both figuratively and literally sucked the marrow out of life (and the thigh bone of a cow).
Fortunately, Chris was able to talk us through each course, telling us what we were about to eat and equipping us with appropriate utensils. Chris spoke with passion and clearly enjoyed working at Esquire.
Across the room sat a renown Sunday Age restaurant reviewer: Dani Valant out on the town with local foodies: Mel Kettle & Fleur Cole.
Dani was in Brisbane running thermomix: "in the mix" cooking classes. My beloved is a Thermomix consultant in her spare time and had attended Dani's course, earlier in the day.
There were others around us taking photos of their food to post on blogs and their twitter feed. I refrained from doing similar. I was to engaged, watching my beloved enjoying and discussing the food, our future and our aspirations. As parents of infants, we don't get out much.
Recently, the someone at work, gave some examples of good customer service that he experienced at the service department of Llewellyn Motors Toyota.
This led to a discussion of the levels of service.
I work for a water/sewage treatment utility. My customers have come to expect that my company will deliver them a high quality product, available on demand & remove their poo, their wee, the water from showers, sinks, washing machines.
My 1.3 million customers use the water we supply them. The soil it and send it back to be treated (and disposed to rivers & the bay). The pressure is on to reduce the cost of the services that my company provides. The cost of raw water is fixed by the Qld State Government. The prices we can charge our customers are capped at Consumer Price Index (CPI) increases.
Meanwhile, there are a billion potential customers (globally) who do not have access to drinking water. There are 2.6 billion people who could be (or should be) in the market for a service provider to collect and treat their poo and wee. There are young women who cannot complete their education beyond puberty, because their schools lack the facilities to allow them to change pads.
So the challenge faced by my company and those involved in my industry around the world - is how can we reduce the cost of the delivery of water and sewage treatment services, yet maintain (or provide) an acceptable level of service. How do we reduce the environmental impacts of providing those services?
Water treatment and transport is energy intensive. Sewage transport and treatment is also energy intensive. Disposal of the effluent and residues also present challenges (and opportunities).
I see a convergence between the needs of developed and developing communities to develop new ways to provide exceptional water and sewage treatment services.
We need to reinvent the toilet!
We also need to develop the institution arrangements, service delivery, the back of house (down stream processing) systems, networks, business models, markets, supply chains etc. to support a new generation of toilet technologies.....
25 May, 2012
Toilet 2.0
Today I had the pleasure of talking about the exciting potential for the next generation of Toilet technologies, to my colleagues at work. I work for a water and sewage treatment utility.
Our current Toilets are connected to a grid in a way that is analogous to a landline telephone connected to copper wires, telephone exchanges and data centres. The toilets in my community, are dependent on a reliable water supply, sewer pumping stations and sewage treatment plants. The floods in Brisbane in January 2011 and the subsequent earthquake in Christchurch and the Tsunami in Japan, demonstrated the vulnerability of these systems.
My ambition (which is shared by many others) is to see the development of the next generation of toilet which are "off the grid".
The imperative is providing services for 2.6 billion people in developing communities, who lack a sustainable place to poo, wee and/or change sanitary pads.
In the developed world, the cost of living pressures, the cost of water, electricity and the cost of running sewer networks and sewage treatment treatment plants are all on the radar.
The regulating authorities in the Qld State Government have capped the price one can charge for water and sewage treatment. The price of raw water is under review. All indications are, that Water Authorities are going to be under significant political pressure to reduce the cost of delivery of services.
Climate change, peak oil, peak phosphorus are all driving the need for change, to reduce the energy intensity of water and sewage treatment services and recover energy, nutrients and/or water from the process.
There arises a need for a next generation of toilets. Yet the toilet is really just a user interface. We need a whole new "back end" to the process.
The first distinction between 1.0 series toilets and the 2.0 series is the separation of one's Number Ones from one's Number twos.
Our Number One's a choc full of nutrients: Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium....
One person's urine contains enough nutrients to grow enough cereal to feed one person.
In my community, our number twos are not nearly as interesting (or valuable). We tend to eat too much processed food. However, the poo from a Vegetarian could be highly valuable. The dry solids can be combusted, digested or under go pyrolysis to generate electricity, heat, light, gas or compost.
The process engineering aspects of Toilet 2.0 are really very straight forward.
The complexity lies in the social engineering. Some of the greatest resistance to change comes from within the water/sewage treatment industry. Today I had the opportunity to make a case for change.
I was hoping someone would say: "It cannot be done!". I was hoping someone might say: " You're crazy!"
However, the questions and discussions were actually intelligent and provocative. There maybe some who want to work on intermediate technologies. Perhaps there is still a need for Toilet 1.1.
My ambitions are still quite modest. Toilet 2.0 is not a silver bullet. Toilet 2.0 is the next generation of toilets. It is time to get Toilet 2.0 out of the laboratories and into your lavatories.
09 March, 2012
why are we walking for water (& sanitation)

- One in eight people in the world do not have access to safe drinking water.
- One in three people don’t have access to a private clean toilet.
16 November, 2011
imagine a world without toilets

30 July, 2011
Urine separation toilets

One of the first principles of process engineering is segregation (or separation of waste streams). The effluent from one process can be the influent for another. In many developed societies, we aggregate our poo & our wee with vast quantities of water, transfer the slurry over vast distances, only to separate the components out again using energy intensive physical, chemical & biological processes.
Physiologically, are poo & our wee are separated. We need to design our user interfaces (toilets) with baffles or separate urinals to enable the collection of urine.
Urine can be a precursor or feedstock for many useful industrial chemicals including fertilizers, sodium hypochlorite (bleach).
Head to the Year Of Humanitarian Engineering Website & join the discussion.
22 July, 2011
poo & wee

The Bill & Melinda Gate's foundation want to re-invent the toilet.....
19 June, 2011
confessions of a toilet cleaner

Well...
I was walking in the Mall
When I saw a cleaner, cleaning.
He was actually emptying the bins
Not on his broom a leaning.
I asked him, how he was that day
He sighed but did not slow up,
For he was on a double shift,
For his replacement had not shown up.
I thought a bit, and then I stopped
Why was a cleaner called for?
What could cleaner in high viz
Be cleaning in the Mall for?
Soon I swept up and emptied bins,
And made the bins all shiny.
My colleagues they would moan and whinge,
They sounded rather whiny.
Yet I swept up. I cleaned up fast
As fast as I could go, sir.
I cleaned the loos, I mopped up stains
But did I whine, well. No, sir.
After that two years went by.
I cleaned from two to ten
I spent mornings as a stay home dad
Unlike most other men......
Well, while I cleaned my city.
More poetry I’d write
And letters to the editor
I’d write with all my might
I learnt how best to use a mop
I drove big diesel sweepers,
I learnt to use a scrubber while
I tweeted to my tweeters
14 May, 2011
international development assistance
The 2011-12 Aid Budget at a glance
Total Australian Official Development Assistance (ODA) in 2011-12 is estimated at $4.8 billion, this is equivalent to 0.35 per cent of Gross National Income (GNI).
New aid funding in the 2011-12 Budget will implement the Government’s 2010 election commitments for the aid program on:
· improving access to education,
· better maternal health for women and children,
· access to water and sanitation,
· tackling avoidable blindness,
· eliminating violence against women, and
· Australian volunteers.
In 2011-12 around 89 per cent, of Australia’s aid will be delivered through AusAID, the remainder will be delivered through other Australian government agencies, such as the Australian Federal Police and the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
Around half of
Assistance in the education, health and economic growth sectors is expected to comprise more than half of Australian aid expenditure in 2011-12.
AusAID’s humanitarian and emergency related expenditure is estimated to increase to $325.0 million in 2011–12. This will support the United Nations, Red Cross, and other international and Non-Government Organisations (NGOs) to meet humanitarian needs in Asia and the Pacific,
04 February, 2011
(Water) boy meets girl (Clumsy)
How shall we celebrate?
It strikes me that this blog post is a cry for help. Professional help.
Over the years, I have done some very silly things...in the name of toilet advocacy with mixed success. Most of my efforts have involved attention seeking behaviour.
The ad went on display at an amateur rowing crew at a corporate rowing regatta. On this occasion I got to meet the Lord Mayor and the lovely Lord Mayoress. I am trying to recall why I was dressed as a Red Moose. Something to do with the name of the rowing crew.

The 2008 toilet team organised a 100 toilet art exhibition featuring Bob McMullen. The original idea was to decorate the old, high flush volume toilets being torn out all over the city, during an unprecedented 7 year drought.
Somehow, along the way Caroma gave us 100 brand new toilets. We recruited various artisans and designers from around Brisbane to decorated the toilets. Councilor David Hinchliffe painted a lovely willow pattern on his toilet. I remember vaguely collecting a lot of toilets on my bicycle and spending $2.5k on freight. One of us (who shall remain nameless) completely failed to organise an online auction and the toilets sat for a few months in Sof's garage.
In 2009, I celebrated World Toilet Day in solitude, fasting, praying in King George Square, whilst contemplating the climate negotiations that were happening at COP15 in Copenhagen.
In 2010, we organised a "Where would you hide?" for World Toilet Day. Followed by a QnA forum on "sanitation", with mixed success.

More recently, I accepted @GirlClumsy's offer to pay my flood levee for me.
For the few people who may not know, GirlClumsy is a professional Journalist. Writer. Traveller. Improviser. Actor. Reviewer. Incredible klutz.
Perhaps she can provide some professionalism or some pole dancing talent.
26 April, 2009
it is high time to re-think water & sanitation in developed, Industrialised communities
Most of our potable water is sourced from dams in the hinterland. There are plans to build another dam over a hundred kilometres North of Brisbane. Yet the storm water that falls on the city of Brisbane (mostly on impervious, paved surfaces is channelled to the Brisbane River, mixes with the estuarine, brackish water and flows out to sea.
A de-salination plant 100 kilometres South, draws saline water from the ocean and uses electricity to purify the sea water and pump it into the so-called "water grid".
Taking a relatively solid reside, which contains some of the most harmful bacteria known to humanity and making a 1-2% slurry, solution, pumped hundreds of kilometres to centralised sewage treatment plants is a very inefficient use of electicity and potable water.
In Brisbane, we currently purify the sewage treatment plant effluent with an energy intensive process called Continuous Mirofiltration, followed by reverse osmosis. The lunacy continues with the purified water being pumped over 70 kilometres to be used to cool the exhaust from the steam turbines of a coal fired power station.
My background is in industrial water treatment (steam generation, heat rejection, process water, corrosion mitigation, anti-scalants, emulsion breaking etc). When I apply the principles of "cleaner production" to domestic sewage treatment, the first thing that needs to be done is separation of waste streams.
In other words, no.1's need to be kept separate from no.2's.
Adding a concentrated source of Nitogen, Phosphorus and trace quantities of endrocrine disruptors to this mix is sheer stupidity, considering the difficulty ond expense of removing the N.P and endrocrine disruptors from the dilute stream.
So what is the alternative?
I understand that Urine-separating toilets have been used as an effective source control measure in many parts of Europe for years. The No.1's can be collected and used beneficially as fertiliser and are a precursor to many industrial chemicals including ammonia, pool chlorine and/or bleach.
The No.2's contain many pathogens, which can be disinfected through dessication and/or heat. Once treated, this residue is a useful soil conditioner and source of organic material. It could even be digested and the biogases could be used to generate electricity.
There is billions of dollars tied up in the infrastructure that perpetuates this system. There is inertia and resistance to change. So just because this is the way it is always been done, does not mean we have to keep doing it this way.
Subvert the dominant paradigm. Lobby your local Authorities and install a urine separation toilet.

